This is a proposal for a final project
about proposals – in a way. The proposal I'm referring to, however,
is not like typical proposals, like the one you are reading now.
Rather, this deals in a type of persuasion rooted in the traditions
of romance, sex, and lust: the mating ritual, specifically.
The performance of every ritual,
whether animal or human, verbal or visual, religious or pagan,
romantic or war-like has at its core a history and weight of some
rhetorical significance. The male peacock does not display his tail
feathers before the batting eyes of a female because they need
stretching; clubbers don't gyrate and thrust their hips at the local
dive because of bad ball and socket joints that need regular movement
to keep the bearings greased; you don't lean in with your elbows on
the counter to flirt with a cute barista because it's loud in the
coffee shop, or because you're a bit jaded and enjoy teasing the
service industry. The mating ritual is rhetoric on display and
dancing.
If to swoon an audience is your
purpose, then your performance must come equipped with just the right
amount of stimulating logos, raw, sexual pathos, and a graceful,
eloquent ethos. Even Plato is pinning his toga a bit higher above the
knee these days because we all – well, most of us – inherently
know how to grab the attention and draw in a potential spouse, lover,
spontaneous dance partner, ad infinitum. But the question remaining
is why? How does one learn to act this way? What do these signifiers
signify?
This is what I hope to address in my
final paper. Through a series of familiar social exhibits that appear
in the subtle positioning of bodies in bars, colorful shows in
nature, and even in conversations at your local fine-dining
establishment, I hope to identify whatever exigence these scenes
demand through an analysis of the interactive rhetoric we use every
single day. This could be studied in more general ways if that works
better for the paper. Or, I thought it might be fun to do some work
directly in the field (as a casual observer, mind) and narrow my
focus to the question of What is the
rhetorical situation of the Bozeman mating ritual? How do the
residents of Bozeman (human and Big Sky fauna, alike) go about their
rhetorical performance in situations ranging from just getting laid
to seeking out a life-long companion?
Using
nature as a necessary framework (because animal rituals meet the
demands of biology before rhetoric) I will compare how our biological
desires are fueled by, and translated into, rhetorical rituals. And
depending on what direction I take my paper, these could be real or
hypothetical.
Because
I don't have the luxury of time to theorize about what makes the
whole clock tick, I will take generous advantage of the fact that
others before me have probably already asked the same questions that
I have, thought about it longer, and made smarter arguments than I
could, and use that a starting off point. Some links and sources that
look promising:
In the
chance that you know of any good publications about the topic off the
top of your head, I would appreciate your feedback.
Kenny,
ReplyDeleteJust saw this on MSN...thought it sounded somewhat like you were working on for here paper!
Here's the link
http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2012/11/dating_guru_blake_eastman_decodes_body_language.html
Thanks!
Delete